Page Comparison

Image Removed

Message 'Include for function modules (UXX) not included in Sync Request' wrongly displayed (UXX belongs to Sync)

While trying to synchronize via SYNC transport the list of objects in RCP, scenario: new FMs on MAINT, it does not process correctly the object REPS/LIMU//RTC/LTM_UTILUXX.
The guided process keeps returning it as not existing on SYNC TR (even though it is there) and proposing you add it.
Confirming all popup-us to add the "missing" object, you are returned to the main screen, exiting the process without triggering the importImage Added

Checking Critical Objects at approval does not work if objects from the TR do not exist in the TM Server

Checking Critical Objects during Approval does not work for sub objects, when only the development class is defined as critical object, with the flag ‘Sub objects included’ set.
The reason was, that the hierarchy of the development class is read locally, if the objects from the transport do not exist in the TM Server, they are not found as critical objects.

The reason was, that the hierarchy of the development class is read locally, if the objects from the transport do not exist in the TM Server, they are not found as critical objects.
The program has been corrected. The objects are now read from the DEV System.

Approval, Quality Assurance

SC-1101

Image Added

Short dump when release a request with activated Special Aspects in TM Badi

Short dump at release of transport request and Special Aspects are activated.

The program has been corrected. Depending on the list of objects to be synchronized, sometimes the wrong include UXX was checked. Synchronization, Workbench

BAdI, Quality Assurance

SC-1130

Image Removed

External TR Cust analysis not being triggered at import in Maint system

Customizing, Objects analysis, Tasklist

SC-1115

Image Removed

In the task list the timestamp info is set to 00:00:00 instead of the released time of request

When the customizing transport is analyzed using Job the creation time is initial1145

Image Added

RFC check whitelist error when selecting multiple systems

In TM transactions in Systems and Groups menu option if multiple systems are selected for check the and one system has error the result of check is not right.

The program has been corrected.

Configuration

SC-1121

Image Added

Subject line incomplete in TM notification emails

When creating a note for a transport with a subject that contains the maximum number of characters, the email subject will be truncated.

The reason is that the subject is also concatenated with the transport number. That's why if it exceeds the 50-character limit, it will be truncated.
The 50-character limit for the subject field is a SAP standard. As a workaround, the subject will also be inserted into the body of the email.
The program has been corrected.

Objects analysisNotifications/Mails

SC-10001124

Missing initial values in filter popup when selecting "Existing SyncRequest" for customizing objects

Customizing

SC-1007

Prio 1 finding "NonLocal Nested Reading DB OP found" at ATC-Check for release

ATC checks at the release of a transport request containing a table maintenance dialog for a maintenance view of a customizing table returns Prio 1 finding 'NonLocal Nested Reading DB OP found" for RTC enhancement /RTC/EHI_COM_COL_CHECK.

The finding has been suppressed with pragma "#EC CI_SEL_NESTED.

Objects analysis

SC-793

Role /RTC/TM_ALL has to be adjusted manually after import in NW > 7.31

After importing the Application Roles transport into a system with a higher version than NetWeaver 7.31, the authorization profile must be manually regenerated.

The cause of the error is the differences in the authorization concept between SAP releases.
The TM role /RTC/TM_ALL has been adjusted.

Roles/Authorizations

SC-1176

Callback rejected by whitelist at transport release

Callback rejected by whitelist at transport release

The reason was a missing function module /RTC/TM_READ_COFILE in the whitelist. Missing function module was added to the whitelist.

Security

SC-1147

Image Removed

Short dump when release a request with activated Special Aspects in TM Badi

Short dump at release of transport request and Special Aspects are activatedImage Added

Cannot exit the popup for 'TM Attributes: Maintain values' without saving the changes

When editing the TM attributes assigned to a Transport Request in TM Monitor, if the TM Attribute value is changed by accident, the user cannot leave the popup without saving the changes.

The program has been corrected.

BAdI, Quality Assurance

SC-1145

TM Attribute, UI

SC-1102

Image Added

Error on the determination of the TM server when TM server is also dev system for another TM server

Error on the determination of the TM server when TM server is also dev system for another TM server.

First it will be checked if the current system is TM server. If it is not a TM server, it will be checked if it is a development system.
As solution an additional info is added to the check, TM server SID if known, flag if the current system is a dev system

TM Connectivity

SC-1122

When releasing a request in development system, wrongly a not needed RFC connection is requested

Error: 'RFC connection ZRTC_TM_<dev_sid> does not exist' when a transport request is released.

The reason was the error in the TM Server determination. The program has been corrected.

The check for the TM server is done in this order (the first match will be considered) :

• is TM server SID known

• is the current system a development system, if yes then the corresponding TM server is considered
• is the current system a TM server

TM Connectivity

SC-1142

Subject line incomplete in TM notification emails

When creating a note for a transport with a subject that contains the maximum number of characters, the email subject will be truncated.

The reason is that the subject is also concatenated with the transport number. That's why if it exceeds the 50-character limit, it will be truncated.
The 50-character limit for the subject field is a SAP standard. As a workaround, the subject will also be inserted into the body of the email

Wrong message when confirming the import of the update queue

In TM_UPDATE, when pressing the Import button (import error free), after checking the files, a pop-up message 'Update TransportManager Import update queue?' is displayed. This message is confusing.

The message was changed to 'Do you want to import the update queue?'.

TM Update Assistant

SC-1023

Image Added

Missing initial values in filter popup when selecting "Existing SyncRequest" for customizing objects

On Customizing when choosing to add an Existing SyncRequest, the filtering popup has no initial values like in Workbench. It should have the same settings as in Workbench when displaying the popup initially.

The program has been corrected.

Notifications/MailsCustomizing

SC-11241007

Image Removed

Error on the determination of the TM server when TM server is also dev system for another TM server

TM Connectivity

SC-1122

Image Removed

RFC check whitelist error when selecting multiple systems

In TM transactions in Systems and Groups menu option if multiple systems are selected for check the and one system has error the result of check is not rightImage Added

External TR Cust analysis not being triggered at import in Maint system

External TR imported into Maint System not triggering analysis comparison on customizing due to original client being different from the target client.

New validation has been added to prevent that use case.

Customizing, Objects analysis, Tasklist

SC-1115

Image Added

In the task list the timestamp info is set to 00:00:00 instead of the released time of request

When the customizing transport is analyzed using Job the creation time is initial.

The program has been corrected.

ConfigurationObjects analysis

SC-11211000

Image Removed

Cannot exit the popup for 'TM Attributes: Maintain values' without saving the changes

When editing the TM attributes assigned to a Transport Request in TM Monitor, if the TM Attribute value is changed by accident, the user cannot leave the popup without saving the changesImage Added

Message 'Include for function modules (UXX) not included in Sync Request' wrongly displayed (UXX belongs to Sync)

While trying to synchronize via SYNC transport the list of objects in RCP, scenario: new FMs on MAINT, it does not process correctly the object REPS/LIMU//RTC/LTM_UTILUXX.
The guided process keeps returning it as not existing on SYNC TR (even though it is there) and proposing you add it.
Confirming all popup-us to add the "missing" object, you are returned to the main screen, exiting the process without triggering the import.

The program has been corrected.

TM Attribute, UI

SC-1102

Image Removed

Checking Critical Objects at approval does not work if objects from the TR do not exist in the TM Server

Approval, Quality Assurance

SC-1101

Image Removed

Wrong message when confirming the import of the update queue

TM Update Assistant

SC-1023

Image Removed

Prio 1 finding "NonLocal Nested Reading DB OP found" at ATC-Check for release

Objects analysis

SC-793Depending on the list of objects to be synchronized, sometimes the wrong include UXX was checked.

Synchronization, Workbench

SC-1130

Image Added

User group passed from Jira is not considered during approval in the OData Service

In Jira App, the buttons for ‘Approve’ are displayed at the User Group level, but the OData call does not consider the user group for which the approval was requested.

The reason is, that the user groups are not taken into consideration. The OData approves all the groups where the user has authorization.

The code was changed, if the user group is passed to the OData, the approval is given only for that user group. If no user group is passed, all approvals for which the user has authorization are given (for Mobile App.)

Integration Framework, OData Services

SC-1111

Image Added

OData Service: Approve TR - User group passed from Jira is not considered for Revoke Approval

‘Revoke Approval’ is displayed at the User Group level, but the OData call does not consider the user group for which the approval was requested.

Root cause: The user groups are not taken into consideration. The OData revoke approval for all the groups where the user has authorization.

The code was changed, if the user group is passed to the OData, the revoke approval is given only for that user group. If no user group is passed, all revoked approvals for which the user has authorization are given (for Mobile App.)

Integration Framework, OData Services

SC-1112